Thursday, August 28, 2008

Sahara Reporters..... report yourself

All Feedback »GeneralYou must be logged in to subscribe.

Another General Complaint
Feedback ID: 3Status: Open
Product: GeneralImplemented? No
Created On: 2/3/2008Created By: feedback
Details: Speculation about motives aside, you have abandoned your original claim:

Other than the speeches he is claiming now, years after the fact, there is no evidence that would suggest that he would have voted against the AUMF.

The link I gave you is not "years after the fact." It is one month after the vote, and he is asked specifically about how he would have voted. He says specifically he would have voted with Durbin against the AUMF. Nothing ambiguous there. You claim there is no evidence and I gave you a link.

You still say:

"He position [SIC] was identical to that of Clinton (see her comments on the Senate floor before the vote.)"

No, she voted for AUMF, and he was against it. Furthermore, he said it was giving Bush carte blanche before the invasion. He understood what Bush could do, even before the invasion, which is something a number of people here are saying no one could have have possibly anticipated. Obama could and did.

Voting
 Votes For 100%      Votes Against 0%      (1 votes)
How would you rate this item?
You must be logged in to vote.

Comments
There are currently no comments.

Post Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.